Prediction Results Report

Transforming ELIXIR 3D-Bioinfo PPI dataset into FAIR-compliant, machine learning-ready resource

PPI Benchmark FAIR ML Features FAIRification Repository

Model Performance Statistics

Comprehensive evaluation of machine learning model performance across multiple metrics and cross-validation folds. Values shown as mean ± standard error.

3
Models
0.758
Best F1 Score
0.754
Avg F1 Score
Logistic Regression
Best Model

Model Performance Summary

Detailed performance metrics for all evaluated models. Values shown as mean ± standard error (SE). Best performing values in each metric category are highlighted.

Model Accuracy Precision Recall F1-Score ROC-AUC
Random Forest 0.756 ± 0.011 0.766 ± 0.029 0.747 ± 0.018 0.754 ± 0.014 0.860 ± 0.005
SVM 0.753 ± 0.011 0.763 ± 0.028 0.746 ± 0.023 0.751 ± 0.013 0.850 ± 0.007
Logistic Regression 0.757 ± 0.013 0.759 ± 0.031 0.764 ± 0.018 0.758 ± 0.015 0.833 ± 0.012

Note: Standard error (SE) represents the variability of the metric across cross-validation folds. Smaller SE indicates more consistent performance.

Figure 1: Model Performance Comparison

Bar chart comparing accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores across different models.

Figure 2: F1 Score per Cross-Validation Fold

Line plot showing F1 score across each cross-validation fold for all models.

Figure 3: Performance Radar Chart

Radar chart visualizing multiple performance metrics (Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1, ROC-AUC) for model comparison.